Sunday, July 02, 2006

"I feel like I'm taking Crazy Pills!"

I am asking the two people who read this blog . . .

Why is it that when I present a new idea, more specifically a challenge, the idea is 'validated' but never defended? For example, if I challenge someone's view of rugged-individualism, the other person will acknowledge that I have challenged their view, their thinking, their paradigm, but never offer a defense against my "attack."

Am I notorious for not reading social cues - people are actually communicating something to me and I'm just not getting it? Am I overly concerned about things that don't actually exist? Do I question too many things so as to form a callous towards me in everyone?

Comments or email would be most appreciated in regards to this.
Thank you,
Blog Manager