I am asking the two people who read this blog . . .
Why is it that when I present a new idea, more specifically a challenge, the idea is 'validated' but never defended? For example, if I challenge someone's view of rugged-individualism, the other person will acknowledge that I have challenged their view, their thinking, their paradigm, but never offer a defense against my "attack."
Am I notorious for not reading social cues - people are actually communicating something to me and I'm just not getting it? Am I overly concerned about things that don't actually exist? Do I question too many things so as to form a callous towards me in everyone?
Comments or email would be most appreciated in regards to this.
Thank you,
Blog Manager
Sunday, July 02, 2006
"I feel like I'm taking Crazy Pills!"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
2 comments:
You have challenged my thinking. Thank you!
That's a challenging question.
(heh)
You know the answer, right? No one likes to debate anymore?
Don't believe me?
I'll arm wrestle you.
Post a Comment